Matthew, thank you for this article and for your new righteous journey to expose fake science. I am studying mechanical engineering at NJIT and I love theoretical physics. I've been diving into countless theories over the years ever since taking that Physics III class at Bergen Community College. I am well aware of the climate science hoax and that is one of the first scientific rabbit holes I went into a couple of years back. You said it yourself, their modeling of cherry-picked data allows for them to establish erroneous conclusions, but an apparent consensus among the scientific community. Natural sciences need researchers well versed in multiple disciplines, not just the area they are focusing on. I just wanted to point you towards some sources I've been familiar with for a few years that led me to rethink scientific dogma.
The first is about climate science, I know you've been there and done that but I never shy away from new perspectives that solidify my rational conclusions. They are a community of astrophysicists and climate scientists from all over the country. The spokesman for them is called Ben Davidson and he has a Space Weather News channel on YouTube called @Suspicious0bservers
Second, you mentioned superconductivity so I would like to point you towards the inventor of multiple Navy "UFO" patents, which included a high-temperature superconductor and compact nuclear fusion device and an inertial mass reduction device and a gravitational wave generator and an electric field generator, which were published around 2017 with the inventor being Salvatore Pais. I highly recommend checking out his patents on Google Patents website by searching his name. He also recently went on a physics podcast called TOE (Theories of Everything) and spoke for the first time since the patents came out. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E6QyAhTB3o
Anyway, I expect great things from you sir. Thank you so much for what you have committed yourself to. I will be following your work very closely. The best is yet to come!
Thank you so much for you comment. I can't tell you how important this early feedback and encouragement is. I will look into the things you mention, to be sure, as I want to incorporate reader feedback as much as possible in this.
I will tell you that I am VERY familiar with Ben Davidson and his channel, and am a contributor to Observer Ranch. I watch his show almost daily. Of course as you know what he is talking about has very heavy implications for humanity, making the scares over "climate change" seem like a walk in the park. I find myself hoping he is wrong. Yet it is very exciting to see "real science" being reborn in the hands of impeccable people like that.
Come back here and you will surely see me talking about him at some point, when I muster up the courage to talk about such sobering things as he does.
Thanks, Joe. It was a great pleasure and honor to see you in Southlake, and share that time with you and Dr. Merritt. Your opinion means a lot to me. If I can be an encouragement to you and others, then this will have been worth it.
Thanks so much for you reply, Jason. I am extremely happy that you were motivated to comment. I need early encouragement like this. A couple things to mention---in regard to Carlo Rubbia, I mentioned him (without naming him) in my talk in Southlake, but I barely had to time to get into that fiasco. To be honest, and to my shame, had never read "Nobel Dreams", the book that Gary Taubes wrote about him and CERN years ago. I only know his general thesis. Perhaps I didn't want to face up to how corrupt things had gotten in high energy physics, or tarnish my opinion of some great minds I have known. My copy of Taubes' book it just arrived yesterday. It turns out to be a used library copy from a college in Texas outside Austin.A very good sign. I certainly will do a deep dive into his book now, and write about my reactions here.
As for Kip Thorne, he is of course one of the giants of the field. His heavy textbook on Gravitation that he co-wrote is colloquially known as "the Bible" among gravitational theorists. Gravitation MAY be one of the saner fields of advanced physics at the moment because it has nothing to do with fundamental particle theory, for the most part, not that people have not spent decades trying to tie them together. As such there is less money and Nobel-Prize glamour in it.
I look forward to more of your feedback as time goes on, and intend to live up to this start!
Matthew, thank you for this article and for your new righteous journey to expose fake science. I am studying mechanical engineering at NJIT and I love theoretical physics. I've been diving into countless theories over the years ever since taking that Physics III class at Bergen Community College. I am well aware of the climate science hoax and that is one of the first scientific rabbit holes I went into a couple of years back. You said it yourself, their modeling of cherry-picked data allows for them to establish erroneous conclusions, but an apparent consensus among the scientific community. Natural sciences need researchers well versed in multiple disciplines, not just the area they are focusing on. I just wanted to point you towards some sources I've been familiar with for a few years that led me to rethink scientific dogma.
The first is about climate science, I know you've been there and done that but I never shy away from new perspectives that solidify my rational conclusions. They are a community of astrophysicists and climate scientists from all over the country. The spokesman for them is called Ben Davidson and he has a Space Weather News channel on YouTube called @Suspicious0bservers
Second, you mentioned superconductivity so I would like to point you towards the inventor of multiple Navy "UFO" patents, which included a high-temperature superconductor and compact nuclear fusion device and an inertial mass reduction device and a gravitational wave generator and an electric field generator, which were published around 2017 with the inventor being Salvatore Pais. I highly recommend checking out his patents on Google Patents website by searching his name. He also recently went on a physics podcast called TOE (Theories of Everything) and spoke for the first time since the patents came out. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E6QyAhTB3o
Anyway, I expect great things from you sir. Thank you so much for what you have committed yourself to. I will be following your work very closely. The best is yet to come!
Thank you so much for you comment. I can't tell you how important this early feedback and encouragement is. I will look into the things you mention, to be sure, as I want to incorporate reader feedback as much as possible in this.
I will tell you that I am VERY familiar with Ben Davidson and his channel, and am a contributor to Observer Ranch. I watch his show almost daily. Of course as you know what he is talking about has very heavy implications for humanity, making the scares over "climate change" seem like a walk in the park. I find myself hoping he is wrong. Yet it is very exciting to see "real science" being reborn in the hands of impeccable people like that.
Come back here and you will surely see me talking about him at some point, when I muster up the courage to talk about such sobering things as he does.
A man after my own heart. Much of what you wrote I would also have written. You might have inspired me to return to writing.
Thanks, Joe. It was a great pleasure and honor to see you in Southlake, and share that time with you and Dr. Merritt. Your opinion means a lot to me. If I can be an encouragement to you and others, then this will have been worth it.
Thanks so much for you reply, Jason. I am extremely happy that you were motivated to comment. I need early encouragement like this. A couple things to mention---in regard to Carlo Rubbia, I mentioned him (without naming him) in my talk in Southlake, but I barely had to time to get into that fiasco. To be honest, and to my shame, had never read "Nobel Dreams", the book that Gary Taubes wrote about him and CERN years ago. I only know his general thesis. Perhaps I didn't want to face up to how corrupt things had gotten in high energy physics, or tarnish my opinion of some great minds I have known. My copy of Taubes' book it just arrived yesterday. It turns out to be a used library copy from a college in Texas outside Austin.A very good sign. I certainly will do a deep dive into his book now, and write about my reactions here.
As for Kip Thorne, he is of course one of the giants of the field. His heavy textbook on Gravitation that he co-wrote is colloquially known as "the Bible" among gravitational theorists. Gravitation MAY be one of the saner fields of advanced physics at the moment because it has nothing to do with fundamental particle theory, for the most part, not that people have not spent decades trying to tie them together. As such there is less money and Nobel-Prize glamour in it.
I look forward to more of your feedback as time goes on, and intend to live up to this start!